Challenges in the Conceptualization and Identification of Fake News in the Media
Abstract
This study examined the challenges in the conceptualization and identification of fake news in the media. The research sought to explore how fake news is conceptualized and defined within scholarly contexts, identify the key challenges encountered in forming clear and consistent definitions, and investigate the difficulties faced by media practitioners in identifying and verifying fake news. The theoretical framework was grounded in Gatekeeping Theory. A qualitative research design was adopted, involving documentary analysis of forty scholarly definitions and semi-structured interviews with sixteen participants comprising eight communication scholars and eight media practitioners purposively selected for their expertise. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurrent patterns and underlying meanings. Findings revealed that fake news is conceptualized as a multidimensional phenomenon involving fabrication, intentional deception, varying degrees of falsity, calculated incentives, and overlapping relationships with related information disorders. Key challenges in conceptualization included conceptual ambiguity, evolving digital contexts, disciplinary fragmentation, and normative tensions. Media practitioners faced difficulties stemming from time pressures, sophisticated digital manipulation, audience polarization, and inadequate institutional support. The study concluded that both conceptual clarity and operational capacity for fake news identification remain constrained by systemic factors operating at multiple gatekeeping levels. Recommendations included developing interdisciplinary definitional frameworks, establishing institutional verification protocols, and investing in technological and training resources to enhance media practitioners' detection capabilities.
This study examined the challenges in the conceptualization and identification of fake news in the media. The research sought to explore how fake news is conceptualized and defined within scholarly contexts, identify the key challenges encountered in forming clear and consistent definitions, and investigate the difficulties faced by media practitioners in identifying and verifying fake news. The theoretical framework was grounded in Gatekeeping Theory. A qualitative research design was adopted, involving documentary analysis of forty scholarly definitions and semi-structured interviews with sixteen participants comprising eight communication scholars and eight media practitioners purposively selected for their expertise. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurrent patterns and underlying meanings. Findings revealed that fake news is conceptualized as a multidimensional phenomenon involving fabrication, intentional deception, varying degrees of falsity, calculated incentives, and overlapping relationships with related information disorders. Key challenges in conceptualization included conceptual ambiguity, evolving digital contexts, disciplinary fragmentation, and normative tensions. Media practitioners faced difficulties stemming from time pressures, sophisticated digital manipulation, audience polarization, and inadequate institutional support. The study concluded that both conceptual clarity and operational capacity for fake news identification remain constrained by systemic factors operating at multiple gatekeeping levels. Recommendations included developing interdisciplinary definitional frameworks, establishing institutional verification protocols, and investing in technological and training resources to enhance media practitioners’ detection capabilities.
References
Allcot, Gentzkow Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. JEP, 211–236 . (2017)
Allen, J., Howland, B., Mobius, M., Rothschild, D., Watts, D. J. Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem . S.A, 1-18. (2020).
Baptista, J. P. (2022). A working definition of fake news: Typology, intentions, and effects. Social Sciences, 2(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci2010043
Egelhofer, J. L., &Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Communication Theory, 29(2), 297–327.
Gelfert, A. (2021). Fake news: A definition. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 661801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.661801
Grech, S., &Mula, A. (2024). Fake news: Offensive or defensive weapon in information warfare? Social Sciences, 14(8), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14080476
Haiden, L., &Althuis, J. (2018). The Definitional Challenges of Fake News. In SBP-BRiMS 2018 Proceedings. Retrieved from https://sbp brims.org/2018/proceedings/papers/challenge_papers/SBP-BRiMS_2018_paper_116.pdf
Kamruzzaman, A. (2025). Combating Fake News: Investigating Media’s Efforts for Fact-Checking in Bangladesh. European Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 4 (4), 1-13.
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F. &Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life; social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143-153.
Martin, J. D., & Hassan, F. (2020). News media credibility ratings and perceptions of online fake news exposure in five countries. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2215–2233.
Mutugi, K. J. ., Nyamboga, N. ., &Matu, N. . (2020). Challenges Kenyan Television Journalists Face in Spotting Fake News. Journal of Development and Communication Studies, 7(1-2), 46–70.
Pehlivanoglu, D., Lin, T., Deceus, F., Heemskerk, A., Sutherland, S., &Ebner, N. (2021). The role of source credibility and analytical reasoning in fake news detection. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 35 - 42.
Shoemaker, P. J., &Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
Shu, K., Wang, S., & Liu, H. (2017). Beyond news contents: The role of social context for fake news detection. Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 452–461.
Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153.
Wang, C.-C. (2020). Fake News and Related Concepts: Definitions and Recent Research Development. Contemporary Management Research, 16(3), 145–174.
Wardle, C., &Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe report. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c
White, D. M. (1950). The “Gate Keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(3), 383–390.
Zhou, X., &Zafarani, R. (2018). Fake news: A survey of research, detection methods, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(5), 1–40.